![]() ![]() I now think to look at two or three rows simultaneously, combining their total number of mines, and then working out their minimum possible placement within the three lines of tiles, to find those that can never be filled no matter the correct placement of the rest. Especially when both of us have missed the same really obvious thing. And I always experience a moment of catharsis by noticing that the point where I’m completely stuck is where he too suddenly slows down and has to remember how he progressed. I’ve learned so much by watching him, and then have been able to apply that knowledge to solving the far tougher puzzles independently. There’s a YouTuber called inn0centive who is a bloody genius, and has created videos explaining the logical path through every single puzzle. I can’t pretend to have gone on this journey on my own. There are so, so many techniques to learn, like counting possible placements of tiles along rows, cascading logic that ends in a point where you realise that one can only go here, or that it’s impossible to put two there. But Tametsi demands more of the player than any other puzzle game I’ve played to find that next deductible play. There is never, ever a need to guess a next move. ![]() Then those done, there are a further 60 super-tough bonus puzzles, which I’m working my way through now for the first time. There are 101 core puzzles, which will take a proper 40+ hours to finish. Some of these will reveal new numbers, and thus you proceed (grrrr) Minesweeper-style to mark or clear them all. These three pieces of information, or sometimes just two of them, are all you need to begin deducing the location of every bomb, letting you clear those you know definitely are not. ![]() Then there are counts for how many of each colour tile contain bombs overall. Numbered tiles indicate how many adjacent tiles contain bombs, while numbers external to the grid tell you how many are highlighted in that row or column. Be better.Įach grid comes with a variation of its core set of rules. Yeah, see, you were all, “Oh, like Minesweeper, eh?” And now you’re all, “Help mummy.” Well that’s YOUR FAULT. ![]() Which is to say, you must identify the location of “mines”, in grids of tiles.Īfter that it bears far more in common with advance logic Fill-a-Pix crossed with picross. Hnnggghh: It’s a bit like Minesweeper, if Minesweeper broke through from the Good Version of our evil universe. This is in the sense that Minesweeper’s core rules are a bit like a complete misunderstanding of so many other far better and more superior puzzle concepts, but no one’s head of them and everyone’s heard of bloody Minesweeper. Tametsi’s core rules are a bit like Minesweeper’s. Minesweeper is loathsome, and every single one of you is wrong to have ever liked it. It’s a horrible, awful, terrible mess of design, in which many moves cannot be deduced but must rather be randomly guessed at, clicking and hoping, and thus is worth nothing. I hate it when people compare puzzle games to Minesweeper. (Also, in my head writing about it here justifies all the time I spend playing it instead of work I should be doing.) And hopefully bring it to the attention of those who haven’t seen it before. Now, I’m being a bit naughty here, because I’ve previously reviewed this on RPS, but having spent countless hours playing it over and over since, and now with its many, many bonus levels, I want to wax on about it some more. Its increasing complexity and perfect difficulty curve makes it one of the most compelling puzzles I’ve had the pleasure to play. It’s up there with Hexcells in my mind, albeit without the latter’s exquisite presentation. Tametsi is one of the best logic puzzle games you can buy on PC. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |